This week had me reviewing various professional communication examples from some of my classmates' portfolios, from Week 2, which offered valuable insights into effective and less effective workplace messaging. The messages highlighted the critical importance of tailoring messages to specific audiences and purposes. Andersons principles countinue to come to mind as the standard for successful communication.
The fundamental rule for effective professional communication, heavily influenced by Anderson's work, is to be reader-centered and purpose-driven. This means every piece of communication should be crafted with a clear understanding of:
- Who your audience is: Their background, existing knowledge, needs, and emotional state.
- What you want them to know, feel, or do: The specific outcome you aim to achieve.
- How to present the information: The structure, tone, level of detail, and visual aids that best serve both the audience and the purpose.
Failing to adhere to this rule often results in confusion, frustration, or a failure to achieve the desired outcome.
One of the examples I read was the description of a company's rebranding initiative, where a sub-company adopts a larger corporation's name. This illustrates an ideal scenario for applying the reader-centered, purpose-driven rule. The classmate's personal view that the rebranding is a "good idea" because it simplifies operations for customers highlights a crucial "why" that should underpin the communication. It addresses different stakeholders within this message. I like how the name changed from sub-company to "connected brands," which removes the stigma of being lesser and suggests a more communal setting.
This scenario exemplifies how proactively anticipating audience needs and clearly justifying changes can turn a complex corporate action into a positive, understood development.
Conversely, the parental leave confirmation message vividly illustrates a "what not to do" and a stark failure to adhere to the governing rule. The classmate's experience, providing five months' notice yet being asked for a birth certificate "4 weeks from my contact date" (implying the date of the message, not the birth) highlights a critical breakdown in communication.
This message failed spectacularly because:
- Lack of Audience Awareness/Empathy: The message rigid-handedly applied a policy without considering the practical reality of the recipient's situation (one cannot provide a birth certificate before the child is born). This demonstrates a profound lack of empathy, causing unnecessary stress and inconvenience for the employee during a significant life event.
- Absence of Clarity and Realism: The requirement itself was ambiguous regarding the "contact date," and unrealistic. Effective professional communication must provide actionable instructions that are both clear and practically achievable.
- Inefficient Process: This type of poorly conceived message leads to avoidable follow-up, clarification emails, and frustration, wasting time for both the employee and HR.
This example starkly contrasts with Anderson's call for communication that is not only clear and concise but also considerate and helpful, anticipating the reader's needs and minimizing friction/frustration.
These examples strongly reinforce that successful professional communication transcends mere information delivery. It demands a deliberate, reader-centered, and purpose-driven approach. While the rebranding context presented an opportunity for effective, strategic messaging that explains the "why" and benefits, the parental leave confirmation served as a powerful cautionary tale. It underscored how neglecting clarity, empathy, and practical considerations can transform a routine confirmation into a significant source of stress and inefficiency. Ultimately, professional communication means consistently striving to inform, influence, and support the audience effectively, ensuring the message serves its intended purpose without creating avoidable hurdles.
Add comment
Comments